Vol VII, Issue 4 Date of Publication: October 28, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.20529/IJME.2022.033

Views
, PDF Downloads:

CTRI requirement of prospective trial registration: Not always consistent

Indraneel Chakraborty
Gayatri Saberwal
Abstract:
In a clinical trial registry, one determines whether a trial is registered prospectively or retrospectively by comparing the date of registration with the date on which enrollment started. However, in Clinical Trials Registry – India (CTRI), in addition, the top of each record is labelled with the phrase “Trial Registered Prospectively” or “Trial Registered Retrospectively”. In examining CTRI records, we have found that (a) although retrospective registration has been disallowed from April 1, 2018, some trials were registered retrospectively; (b) in some cases, enrollment started after registration, even though they were labelled “Trial Registered Retrospectively”, which is misleading; and (c) in some cases, the date of first enrollment was modified, changing a retrospective registration to a prospective one, although the label “Trial Registered Retrospectively” persisted. This, too, is misleading. The CTRI administration should take suitable steps to prevent late registration and mislabelling of trials regarding their registration status.


Copyright and license
©Indian Journal of Medical Ethics 2022: Open Access and Distributed under the Creative Commons license ( CC BY-NC-ND 4.0),
which permits only non-commercial and non-modified sharing in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

Full Text

HTML | PDF

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
Please restrict your comment preferably to 800 words
Comments are moderated. Approval can take up to 48 hours.

Help IJME keep its content free. You can support us from as little as Rs. 500 Make a Donation