Vol VIII, Issue 1 Date of Publication: January 10, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.20529/IJME.2023.006

Views
, PDF Downloads:

DISCUSSION


Self-correction is essential to science: Author’s response

Kishor Patwardhan

DOI: 10.20529/IJME.2023.006

I thank R Srivatsan [1] and Shailaja Chandra [2] for commenting on my reflective article [3]. While it is true that the scientific establishment has, on many occasions, betrayed the public trust because of the power and money associated with it, the same cannot be said of “science” as such. Science is an idea that places evidence-based thinking above everything else while understanding a phenomenon. The results of this endeavour often depend on how well people apply it in different situations. Thalidomide and Rofecoxib could be taken as two examples where the biomedical sciences have disappointed the public [4]. However, one must remember that science cannot be blamed for causing these disasters; instead, it is the “science establishment” that must take the blame. After all, was it not because of science that these mistakes were exposed? By “establishment” I mean the entire mechanism that plans and regulates drug development, safety testing, marketing approvals, post marketing pharmacovigilance, journal editing, publications, etc.

We must remember that the alternative medicine establishment, such as that of Ayurveda, is not devoid of industry and power influences, though the scale may be smaller. Hence, the adverse effects potentially associated with Ayurveda interventions cannot just be ignored [5]. In fact, Ayurveda classics have explicitly cautioned about potential adverse effects in many instances, such as after the administration of Panchakarma procedures [6].

Self-correction is a major characteristic of science. Ayurveda theories and practices should be subjected to this process of re-examination and self-correction. The assertion by Fontanarosa and Lundberg in this context is worth noting [7]. They argue that there is no alternative medicine, instead there is either “proven” or “unproven” medicine. When something from the alternative medicine domain is proven, it qualifies as good medicine.

Much like modern medicine, Ayurveda too is based on evidence-based thinking (Yukti Vyapashraya Chikitsa) [8]. My response to Srivatsan’s comment [1] would be that I wish to see the artificial demarcation between Ayurveda and science fade away completely so that all that stands the scrutiny of research qualifies as science, and humanity receives the benefits of the same. Of course, while doing so, caution needs to be exercised to preserve and nurture the cultural facets of Ayurveda.

Banaras Hindu University, where I am serving as a professor, has many experiences to share when it comes to Ayurveda education. Madan Mohan Malaviya, the founder of the university, had started an experiment where the students were simultaneously trained in both Ayurveda and contemporary sciences through an integrated graduate degree programme. BG Ghanekar, one of the renowned teachers who taught at this university, records explicitly that the graduates who were trained under this programme were better equipped to cater to the primary healthcare needs of the community than those who were trained exclusively in either western medicine or Ayurveda. Dr Ghanekar, who was himself a formally trained expert in both the streams, states that the two sciences are in a continuum with each other and are not mutually exclusive. He further laments that this programme was discontinued despite its evident success because of powerful vested interests.[9]

Shailaja Chandra in her comment [2] draws attention to the reforms required in the Bachelor of Ayurvedic Medicine and Surgery (BAMS) curricula. As Vaidyaratnam PS Warrier had suggested about a hundred years ago, it is high time the classical textbooks of Ayurveda are revised by incorporating newer knowledge [8]. While doing so, outdated speculations and theories should be strictly cast off. A committee comprising of Ayurveda scholars, educationists, practitioners, and biomedicine experts, if asked to take up this task, should be able to achieve this in the next five years or so [10].

The role of Ayurveda, as practised today, is mostly at the primary level of healthcare and not so much in secondary and tertiary care medicine. It must also be clear that our graduates would feel crippled if they were not able to use some essential life-saving drugs such as antibiotics in managing life-threatening emergency conditions. Many states have already done this through introducing amendments to The Drugs and Cosmetics Act [11]. This can at least make Ayurveda a feasible career option.

I have shown in my reflective article [3] how ad hoc conjectures are used to rescue our theories. My mention of the falsifiability principle was primarily aimed at shedding light on this aspect and not to prove anything else.

To quote George Thomas, “One wonders what psychological violence is being perpetrated on the students of these traditional medical methods by insisting on continuing to teach what is obviously wrong.”[12] After explaining these crucial issues with examples, I hope there is no room left for any argument that seeks to retain outdated theories in the curricula and to continue teaching them as though they are eternal truths.

Acknowledgment: I thank Dr GL Krishna for providing me with some of the references cited here and for helping me in refining my thoughts.

References

  1. Srivatsan R. Can Ayurveda initiate a paradigm shift? A response to Patwardhan. Indian J Med Ethics. 2023 Jan-Mar; 8(1) NS:66-67. https://doi.org/10.20529/IJME.2023.004
  2. Chandra S. Some thoughts on the undergraduate Ayurveda curriculum. Indian J Med Ethics. 2023 Jan-Mar; 8(1) NS:65-66. https://doi.org/10.20529/IJME.2023.004
  3. Patwardhan K. Confessions of an Ayurveda professor. Indian J Med Ethics. 2023 Jan-Mar; 8(1) NS:61-64. https://doi.org/10.20529/IJME.2022.049
  4. Kaur U, Chakrabarti SS. Need for focused pharmacovigilance in the face of rapid COVID-19 vaccine development. Curr Drug Saf. 2022 Sep 28. https://doi.org/10.2174/1574886317666220928151519
  5. Patwardhan K, Pathak J, Acharya R. Ayurveda formulations: A roadmap to address the safety concerns. J Ayurveda Integr Med. 2017 Oct-Dec;8(4):279-282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaim.2017.08.010
  6. Sharma PV. (Editor). Caraka Samhita. Siddhi Sthana. Volume 2, Chapter 6 (29-30). (Reprint), Varanasi, Chaukhambha Orientalia (Publisher).Jaikrishnadas Ayurveda Series No. 36. 2008. Page 625
  7. Fontanarosa PB, Lundberg GD. Alternative Medicine Meets Science. JAMA. 1998;280(18):1618–1619. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.280.18.1618
  8. Krishna GL. What ails the current approach to Ayurveda. Opinion. The Hindu. 2022 Jul 11 [2022 Dec 21]. Available from: https://www.thehindu.com/opinion/op-ed/what-ails-the-current-approach-to-ayurveda/article65624019.ece
  9. Ghanekar BG. Vaidyakiya Subhashita Sahityam Athava Sahityika Subhashita Vaidyakam. Chaukhambha Sanskrit Sansthan (Publishers). Kashi Sanskrit Series 184. Varanasi. 2018 (reprint). [Sanskrit and Hindi]
  10. Ghanekar BG. Ayurvedarahasyadipika commentary on Sushruta Samhita: Sutra Sthanam. Meharchand Lacchmandas Publications, New Delhi. 1998 (reprint). [Hindi]
  11. Chandra S, Patwardhan K. Allopathic, AYUSH and informal medical practitioners in rural India – a prescription for change. J Ayurveda Integr Med. 2018 Apr-Jun;9(2):143-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaim.2018.05.001
  12. Thomas G. Response to Nikhil Govind – What is a knowledge system? Indian J Med Ethics. 2022 Apr-Jun;7(2):150-151. https://doi.org/10.20529/IJME.2022.011
About the Authors
Kishor Patwardhan ([email protected])
Department of Kriya Sharir, Faculty of Ayurveda, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University,
Varanasi — 221 005, Uttar Pradesh, INDIA.
Manuscript Editor: Sandhya Srinivasan

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
Please restrict your comment preferably to 800 words
Comments are moderated. Approval can take up to 48 hours.

Comments:
  1. Shrirama dongre
    Ayurveda practitioner in Bangalore , India
    11 January 2023

    When I see the plight of Ayurveda graduates, their training in colleges, and their practice I feel this ayurveda field as sinking ship. But people like you, Dr. GL Krishna, Dr.Shailaja Chandra ma’am give us some hope that this ship may sail with new hope. I seriously thank you people for standing for the truth and taking up the matter of Ayurveda seriously.

    • Affiliation: Ayurveda practitioner in Bangalore
    • Country: India
Help IJME keep its content free. You can support us from as little as Rs. 500 Make a Donation