Announcements A Joint Statement on Technical, legal, ethical and implementation concerns regarding Aarogya Setu and other apps introduced during COVID-19 in India by Jan Swasthya Abhiyan (JSA), Internet Freedom Foundation (IFF), Forum for Medical Ethics Society (FMES), and All India People’s Science Network (AIPSN)   |   Submission to the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) on behalf of Hub5 (HEaL Institute, APU, Seher-CHSJ, and IAPH) – COPASAH on human rights issues confronted by ASHAS and ANMs during the Covid-19 pandemic | Aug 7, 2020   |   Letter to MMC by FMES, PUCL-MH, FAOW, and MFC urging to restore its order suspending licenses of two doctors accused of abetting the suicide of Dr Payal Tadvi

Right to human dignity

Ujjwala Mhatre

DOI: 10.20529/IJME.2010.014


Abstract

The Supreme Court (SC) judgment on the right of a mentally retarded woman to continue with her pregnancy was the outcome of a petition filed in the apex court. This petition appealed against the order of the Punjab and Haryana HC to terminate the pregnancy of a woman who had been raped by staff at the government shelter, Nari Niketan, in Sector 26, Chandigarh where she was an inmate. The High Court had based its reasoning on the fact that the woman was an orphan suffering from mental retardation and would therefore, be unable to look after the child once it was born.

Full Text

HTML PDF

Keywords

N/A

Refbacks

There are currently no refbacks.

Article Views

PDF Downloads

Click here to support US