The landmark 1995 judgment by the Supreme Court of India included doctors within the purview of the Consumer Protection Act (CPA) 1986, hinting that other professions, including legal services, could also fall under its ambit. However, in 2024, the apex court ruled in ‘Bar of Indian Lawyers Through its President vs DK Gandhi PS National Institute of Communicable Diseases and Anr.’, that lawyers are not liable for professional deficiencies under the CPA, emphasising the lack of universal standards for assessing dereliction of duty in legal services. Although this landmark verdict let advocates off the hook, it calls into question the Court’s 30-year-old decision. This ruling has reignited the debate on whether doctors should be equated with other service providers under the CPA 2019, particularly in light of the rise in defensive medicine practices, which increase healthcare costs and erode doctor–patient trust. In this commentary, we will discuss the analysis and observations of the apex court in the DK Gandhi case, contributing to the ongoing discourse on medical liability under the CPA in India.