Announcements A Joint Statement on Technical, legal, ethical and implementation concerns regarding Aarogya Setu and other apps introduced during COVID-19 in India by Jan Swasthya Abhiyan (JSA), Internet Freedom Foundation (IFF), Forum for Medical Ethics Society (FMES), and All India People’s Science Network (AIPSN)   |   Submission to the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) on behalf of Hub5 (HEaL Institute, APU, Seher-CHSJ, and IAPH) – COPASAH on human rights issues confronted by ASHAS and ANMs during the Covid-19 pandemic | Aug 7, 2020   |   Letter to MMC by FMES, PUCL-MH, FAOW, and MFC urging to restore its order suspending licenses of two doctors accused of abetting the suicide of Dr Payal Tadvi

Referral for abortion

Prathima Radhakrishnan

DOI: 10.20529/IJME.2009.078


Abstract

Referral of patients for termination of a pregnancy by those physicians who are against abortion always raises ethical issues. The authors in this paper refer to the Committee on Ethics Opinion from the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG), “The limits of conscientious refusal in reproductive medicine,”which stated that physicians opposed in conscience to abortion nonetheless have an ethical obligation to “provide accurate and unbiased information” and to “refer patients in a timely manner to other providers.” The American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians and Gynecologists in their response to this opinion states: “The idea that physicians are obligated to provide or refer for elective abortion services simply on the basis of ‘patient request’ is antithetical to the practice of modern medicine.”

Full Text

HTML PDF

Keywords

N/A

Refbacks

There are currently no refbacks.

Article Views

PDF Downloads

Click here to support US