Vol , Issue Date of Publication: January 01, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.20529/IJME.2018.005

Views
, PDF Downloads:

Menstruation: a complex saga

Rakhi Ghoshal
Abstract:
In their letter, Singh and Thawani highlight the gender insensitivity of the government which, after declaring items such as sindoor, bindis and condoms as tax-free, opted to levy 12% tax on sanitary napkins, equating the napkin with items such as packaged dry fruits, fruit juices, cell phones and so on. While the new sanitary napkin tax is actually a drop from the earlier 14.5%, in a regime where all taxes were reconsidered and revised, the authors' argument that sanitary napkins should have been exempted from tax is absolutely valid.


Copyright and license
©Indian Journal of Medical Ethics 2018: Open Access and Distributed under the Creative Commons license ( CC BY-NC-ND 4.0),
which permits only non-commercial and non-modified sharing in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

Full Text

HTML | PDF
Help IJME keep its content free. You can support us from as little as Rs. 500 Make a Donation