Announcements Citizenship, Governance and Accountability in Health – Join the COPASAH Conclave of Global Health Accountability and Human Rights Advocates: October 15-18, 2019 New Delhi, India   |   Open Letter: Stop the war on Syria’s hospitals


Abuse of drugs (1)

The misuse of drugs is a major problem throughout the world. This is, in part, due to the lack of information provided to the patient. The responsibility for this must be shared by the prescribing doctor, manufacturer, the individual dispensing the drug and the consumer himself.

Even in developed countries, over half the patients do not know how, when and with what to take their medicines. The vast majority have no information on potential side-effects. The situation is worse in India.

Many patients complain that not enough information is provided to them. This is especially common in government hospitals and dispensaries where a few doctors cater to a large number of patients and thus have little time during an ordinary consultation. Several surveys have shown that 30-80% of patients fail to comply with the physicians’ instructions on the usage of drugs.

A patient’s knowledge remains insufficient if he is only provided verbal information. It is important to ensure appropriate labelling of the drug package, provide a simple written plan of therapy and leaflets on the drugs prescribed, send reminders, ensure follow up visits and facilitate self-management.

The 8 following is the minimum information to be provided on the leaflets given to the patient:

  • Clearly indicate the date when the drug will lose its full potency.
  • State the consequences of non-compliance.
  • State the desired effects from therapy and request consultation with the doctor if these are delayed or fail to appear.
  • State unwanted effects that can be observed by the patient and those which can only be detected by the doctor or on tests.
  • State circumstances that may require a change of treatment.
  • The text should be simple, clear and concise.
  • All terms should be defined. All suggestions must be precise and specific.

Death assisted by a physician (2)

This warmly commended paper considers the debate over the ethics of death assisted by a physician, keeping personal and professional integrity in focus. The moral dilemma consequent to conflicting directives of conscience is addressed. ‘Considerable reflection, deliberation, consultation and study may be required to arrive at a position which is considered reasonable.’

Whilst killing a patient can be looked at as the ultimate harm, deaths that bring a full life to a peaceful close has long been regarded as merciful. The description of pneumonia as ‘the old man’s friend’ is an example. The foregoing of life-sustaining intervention to allow the patient to die is another.

It is the active induction of death, conflicting, as it does, with the duty to preserve life, that has made debate necessary. Kass put up an interesting argument. An event can be beneficial only to one who continues to gain from it. The authors counter by pointing out that an act removing an evil (in this case unrelievable suffering) can also be termed beneficial. .

Participation by a physician in capital punishment is contrasted with voluntarily assisting a terminally ill person in agony to die.

The journal also features six other papers (pages 17-19, 19-23, 24-25, 28-35, 36-43, 44-45) on this theme. The last two papers feature death in hospice, Dame Cicely Saunders bringing the discussion to a close. A table on page 39 features ‘The death with dignity act’.

Gene therapy (3)

A twenty-four page supplement considers such issues as priorities in genetic medicine, informed consent in prenatal testing, legal aspects, commercial aspects of genetic diagnostics, the use of human growth hormone and the policy for screening to uncover cystic fibrosis.


  1. Lal A, Sethi A, Ray A: Informing patients about drugs. Express Pharma Pulse June 15, 1995. Page 8.
  2. Miller Franklin G, Brody Howard: Professional integrity and physician-assisted death. Hastings Center Report 1995; 25;8:17.
  3. Group on Human Genome Research: Public priorities for genetic services. Hastings Center Report, Special Supplement 1995; 25: S1-S24.
About the Authors

Editorial Team ()




There are currently no refbacks.

Click here to support US