A doctor in Madhya Pradesh was arrested when several children died, after consuming a toxin-contaminated cough syrup he had prescribed. The Indian Medical Association condemned the arrest, stating that the prescribing doctor could not have known about the contamination [1]. Social media posts poured in from all quarters, including doctors, condemning the government for making the doctor a scapegoat to cover up their own inefficiency. But, when the police report filed in court, — opposing the doctor’s bail application — charged him with taking a 10% commission from the manufacturer, the attitude of the doctors changed completely [2]. The medical fraternity disowned him overnight and declared him guilty before he was even tried on the charges. Imagine that he had been a politician or an individual belonging to an organisation. There would have been a plethora of statements like, “He is a victim of political vendetta”, “We shall fight it to the end”, and “We have full faith in the judiciary” … etc. This incident gives us an insight into the attitude of doctors as a group, which makes them take the moral high ground and judge their own colleague as an offender long before the person has been tried, rather than lend him support.
Copyright and license ©Indian Journal of Medical Ethics 2026: Open Access and Distributed under the Creative Commons license ( CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits only non-commercial and non-modified sharing in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.