Announcements A Joint Statement on Technical, legal, ethical and implementation concerns regarding Aarogya Setu and other apps introduced during COVID-19 in India by Jan Swasthya Abhiyan (JSA), Internet Freedom Foundation (IFF), Forum for Medical Ethics Society (FMES), and All India People’s Science Network (AIPSN)   |   Submission to the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) on behalf of Hub5 (HEaL Institute, APU, Seher-CHSJ, and IAPH) – COPASAH on human rights issues confronted by ASHAS and ANMs during the Covid-19 pandemic | Aug 7, 2020   |   Letter to MMC by FMES, PUCL-MH, FAOW, and MFC urging to restore its order suspending licenses of two doctors accused of abetting the suicide of Dr Payal Tadvi

Ethical clarity in clinical approaches to rabies prevention in re-exposure cases

Saurav Basu , Suneela Garg

DOI: 10.20529/IJME.2020.091


The lack of adherence to the recommended rabies post-exposure prophylaxis guidelines by physicians during encounters with cases of animal bite re-exposure results in enormous avoidable economic costs, wastage of scarce resources, and is a significant but neglected health concern. The challenges encountered in managing animal bite re-exposure cases arise from deficiencies in the existing health system reflect an overlooked and largely unreported ethical dilemma. Healthcare providers in managing the ethical demands arising from this situation generally tend to uphold the principle of non-maleficence while overlooking the claims of distributive justice and patient autonomy.

Full Text





There are currently no refbacks.

Article Views

PDF Downloads

Click here to support US