Vol , Issue Date of Publication: April 01, 2003

Views
, PDF Downloads:

ECT: A measured defence

Chittaranjan Andrade
Abstract:
Waikar et al. express forceful opinions about ECT. I am duty bound to inform readers that their article contains at least 25 serious factual errors, and 17 serious errors of perspective and context. Space constraints do not allow me to provide a point-wise, scientifically-referenced refutation of their article; however, if readers with specific concerns write to me, I will provide clarifications supported by research published in journals of repute.


Copyright and license
©Indian Journal of Medical Ethics 2016: Open Access and Distributed under the Creative Commons license ( CC BY-NC-ND 4.0),
which permits only non-commercial and non-modified sharing in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

Full Text

HTML | PDF
Help IJME keep its content free. You can support us from as little as Rs. 500 Make a Donation