Announcements A Joint Statement on Technical, legal, ethical and implementation concerns regarding Aarogya Setu and other apps introduced during COVID-19 in India by Jan Swasthya Abhiyan (JSA), Internet Freedom Foundation (IFF), Forum for Medical Ethics Society (FMES), and All India People’s Science Network (AIPSN)   |   Submission to the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) on behalf of Hub5 (HEaL Institute, APU, Seher-CHSJ, and IAPH) – COPASAH on human rights issues confronted by ASHAS and ANMs during the Covid-19 pandemic | Aug 7, 2020   |   Letter to MMC by FMES, PUCL-MH, FAOW, and MFC urging to restore its order suspending licenses of two doctors accused of abetting the suicide of Dr Payal Tadvi

Counselling for thalassaemia

Editorial Team


This audit of the counselling process for couples in the UK whose pregnancies were affected by a major thalassaemia sought to measure how and when genetic risk was identified for each couple, and whether and when prenatal diagnosis was offered. The findings: standard practice of prenatal screening and counselling for haemoglobin disorders was not followed in a large proportion of the couples interviewed, resulting in a number of couples giving birth to a child with thalassaemia major. If they had been offered prenatal diagnosis, some of these couples would have terminated their pregnancies. Although antenatal screening and counselling for haemoglobin disorders are standard practices in the United Kingdom, they are delivered inadequately and inequitably. An explicit national policy is needed, to make early prenatal diagnosis available to all couples.

Full Text





There are currently no refbacks.

Article Views

PDF Downloads

Click here to support US