Announcements A Joint Statement on Technical, legal, ethical and implementation concerns regarding Aarogya Setu and other apps introduced during COVID-19 in India by Jan Swasthya Abhiyan (JSA), Internet Freedom Foundation (IFF), Forum for Medical Ethics Society (FMES), and All India People’s Science Network (AIPSN)   |   Submission to the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) on behalf of Hub5 (HEaL Institute, APU, Seher-CHSJ, and IAPH) – COPASAH on human rights issues confronted by ASHAS and ANMs during the Covid-19 pandemic | Aug 7, 2020   |   Letter to MMC by FMES, PUCL-MH, FAOW, and MFC urging to restore its order suspending licenses of two doctors accused of abetting the suicide of Dr Payal Tadvi

Budget 2008 and health care: less of the same?

George Thomas, Sandhya Srinivasan

DOI: 10.20529/IJME.2008.021


What is remarkable about the Budget 2008-2009 as far as health care is concerned is that there is nothing remarkable about it. It continues the pattern that has been set in place for well over four decades now, of providing schemes which at best can be called hoodwinking the people. Thus government spending on health as a proportion of gross domestic product (GDP) will remain about one per cent (central and state), well below the promised three per cent of the GDP (mentioned in the National Health Policy) and the five per cent suggested by the World Health Organization. This year we see some increase in allotment to the National Rural Health Mission and some noise about a similar urban mission, to list two of the pick and choose proposals. When the outlays are adjusted for inflation, it is a moot point whether there will be a marginal rise or, in fact, a fall. What is clear is that very little has changed.

Full Text





There are currently no refbacks.

Article Views

PDF Downloads

Click here to support US