Vol , Issue
Date of Publication: October 01, 2008
DOI: https://doi.org/10.20529/IJME.2008.073
Views
, PDF Downloads:
Correspondence
Authors’ reply
George Thomas
Sandhya Srinivasan
Abstract:
Dr Vishal Sharma has raised a single objection to our editorial, that the statement: "Dr Venugopal had incurred the displeasure of Dr Ramadoss because he had supported students who agitated against the reservation of seats for Other Backward Classes in AIIMS" is unsubstantiated. Dr Venugopal's support of the agitation was a finding of the Thorat Committee Report as reported widely in the press. We provided a reference to one such press report.
Copyright and license
©Indian Journal of Medical Ethics 2016: Open Access and Distributed under the Creative Commons license ( CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits only non-commercial and non-modified sharing in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.