This letter-writer comments on the common practice of viewing the past through rose-coloured glasses. “We… were just as insensitive and inhuman as our current counterparts.” Just as the senior physicians of today view the younger generation with distress, “my professors thought we were mesmerised by gadgetry. They questioned our humaneness and ethics when we scoffed at their practice of house calls. My guess is that their predecessors looked at them in the same way.” At the heart of this is the eventual incorporation by all practitioners of the healer’s art. “with all the negativism, introspection, economic buffets, gain and losses of respect, triumphs and failures, progress and retreats, this process continues ad infinitum — keeping alive the flame of medicine’s art and humanity.”
Medical screening for a variety of conditions is justified on the strength of the assumption that the earlier disease is detected, the better it is for the patient. On examination, however, the assumption turns out to be severely flawed, and inadequate anyway, since it is not only the patient with whom we should be concerned, but healthy people as well. Instead of making assumptions about the ill, we should prove a test’s overall benefit to the individual taking it before we recommend it. Some of the examples that the author discusses in the course of this essay are routine mammograms for women in their 40s, digital rectal exams and PSA screening for prostrate cancer and cholesterol screening.
Are medical practitioners bound to be truthful to their patients? Is there a difference between lying and intentional deception? In the context of the relationship between the cancer patient and her/ his doctor, the author responds to an essay which argues that doctors and nurses are not obliged to refrain from intentional deception. The author argues that the lying and intentional deception are morally the same thing, and discusses why physicians should not intentionally deceive patients and why they should respect the patients’ right to act upon his own will.
The authors argue that the World Bank-launched Disability Adjusted Life Year discriminates against the disabled. The approach behind the DALY, a combined measure of morbidity and mortality, presupposes that the disabled have less valuable lives than do people without disabilities, and that they are less entitled to scarce health resources for life-extending interventions. The authors note that such assumptions are in contrast with basic principles of the WHO.
Is it ethical to perform “placebo brain surgery” on patients with a neurological disease to test an experimental treatment? Two papers in this issue of the New England Journal of Medicine argue the cases for and against.
Dr Thomas Freeman reports on a trial evaluating the value of foetal nerve cell implants to regenerate brain cells in patients with Parkinson’s disease. “Thirty-six adults with advanced Parkinson’s disease whose symptoms could not be satisfactorily controlled with medical therapy consented to be randomly assigned to one of two experimental methods, or to placebo surgery.” In the third group, the surgeon bores a hole into the patient’s skddull, but does not receive the brain cells; however, s/ he does get the same follow-up treatment, including the anti-rejection drug cyclosporin. The doctor argues that placebo surgery is essential to prevent the proliferation of untested medical life-saving techniques.
The study is strongly opposed by ethicist Dr Ruth Macklin, who notes that ‘sham surgery’ poses significant physical risks, and violates the tenet of minimising the harm to volunteers in medical research.
In this discussion of the concept of medical professionalism, the authors note that physicians today are not equipped to respond to the threat to their professionalism from “perverse financial incentives, fierce market competition, and the erosion of patients’ trust”. Medical professionalism is being forgotten in the battle between the open competition and government regulation. “Physicians, feeling trapped between these camps, are turning to unionisation and other tactics.” They propose that reference to three guiding principles — devotion to service, profession of values, and negotiation within society — would permit physicians and their organisations to raise dissent in an ethical manner.
A newspaper investigation which concluded at least 142 patients in the US had died while in restraints or seclusion in the past decade accelerated work on new standards for patients’ rights. These standards apply to all patients in governmentsubsidised Medicaid and Medicare health programmes. The author describes the new guidelines, notes the improvements, and points out their limitations. The central problem, he argues, is that “the rules do not make it clear enough that competent patients have a right to refuse any medical treatment and the use of restraints can never be justified as a means of forcing treatment on a competent patient who is refusing treatment.” He illustrates his point through the case of a competent adult asthma patient who voluntarily entered a hospital for treatment, was restrained against her will and without the permission of her family, and forcibly intubated.
In response to the clearly ineffective role played by journals in influencing therapy, the authors note: “in only one of the 122 reports of randomised controlled trials of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors were adequate details given about the method of randomisation, and these reporting deficiencies are present in some of the world’s most prestigious medical journals.” This essay discusses the value of publicising a study’s protocol and of electronic publishing and archiving of medical research, and describes the history of such efforts, with special reference to the role of the Cochrane database of systemic reviews.
How does one respond to the ethical and legal problems raised by a diagnosis of persistent or permanent vegetative state (PVS)? Strict adherence to the doctrine of the sanctity of life would require carers to continue to maintain the individual, perhaps for many years. However, few would regard this as an appropriate outcome when the person clearly has no capacity to interact with the environment and has no likelihood of recovery. However, the ethical and legal commitment to the sanctity of life has led courts to employ a variety of approaches to this situation in order to find a way in which the person with PVS can be allowed to die. It is argued that each of the approaches is disingenous and ultimately unhelpful. What the law is doing is endorsing nonvoluntary euthansasia, but dressing it up as something else. This is unhelpful for all concerned and the time has come for a review of all end-of-life decisions so that doctors, patients and relatives can make honest decisions without fear of legal reprisal.
While rising Caesarean section rates have been the subject of much attention and debate worldwide, there is not much information available on this rate and its potential adverse impact in India. This survey based on a standard Expanded Programme on Immunisation 30-cluster design, was carried out in an urban, educated, middle/ upper class population in Chennai. Mothers of 210 children aged 12-36 months were interviewed and data collected on immunisation and breast-feeding practices as well as mode of delivery. This generated population-based data on the C-section rate and its influence on breast-feeding. It was found that 45 per cent of the babies had been delivered by C section; these babies started late on breastfeeds, were given prelacteal feeds more often and colustrum less often. The authors note that a rate of 40-50 per cent is extremely difficult to justify, and that C-sections adversely affect breast feeding practices. They call for more data and audits on C-section rates in India, and a wider debate on its potential adverse impact on the health of mothers and newborns.
A report by the US Institute of Medicine (IoM) concludes that silicone gel-filled breast implants do not cause chronic disease, but warns that they often cause local and perioperative problems that have to be corrected surgically. About 70 per cent of the 1.8 million women in the US with such implants by 1997 had them for cosmetic reasons. In the last decade, many brought law suits arguing that the implants leak silicone and cause systemic immunological damage. The committee’s chairman says, “It is clear that silicone breast implants can cause serious problems. It is essential that women understand these risks before they decide to undergo this surgery.” The report calls for a new procedure for obtaining informed consent in which plastic surgeons must tell women about the incidence of postoperative and long-term complications. Other researchers have concurred, and called for an international research collaboration following women with implants. One researcher added, “There is a discrepancy between the mostly uncontrolled case reports and the largescale studies. So perhaps there ought to be a small door left open, to see if there is something we have missed.”
In June 1999, the UK National Health System published the first comparative statistics on death rates after surgery. The statistics are meant to identify hospitals which are out of line with the average. While there were many complaints on what the statistics did not account for, as well as about errors and other data quality issues, the publication of such figures is considered a milestone in the UK.
It is only five years since England began publishing comparative administrative indicators — hospital waiting times, ambulance response times and operation cancellation rates. The June report had six clinical indicators involving mortality, discharges and readmission, as well as 41 revised performance indicators including hospital waiting times, cancer survival rates and tooth decay in children.
Just two decades ago medical audit was regarded as such an invasion of clinical independence that the royal commission into health refused to even look at it. This changed with the Bristol inquiry following the media outcry of which the health secretary called for a “system which collects and monitors information on clinical
performance, provides an early warning if things are going wrong, and then helps put things right.” Ironically the current statistics are too broad to have picked up the unacceptably high death rate among children after heart surgery in Bristol, but the aim is to make them more precise over time.
This letter comments on a study of surgeons’ proficiency and speed using a virtual reality laparoscopic surgery system which found that surgeons who had been deprived of sleep made about 20 per cent more errors and took about 14 per cent longer than when rested. The writer notes that these and other similar findings have failed to curtail this common, and correctable, current medical practice in the US. “Given the current evidence, unless a randomised, prospective, double blind, controlled trial shows that sleep deprivation of surgeons does not diminish the quality of surgical (or medical) care, patients should not have to suffer from the iatrogenic disease of having a sleep-deprived physician.”
This review on sociology and modern health care summarises some of the major areas of health sociology, and shows how many of these areas have been incorporated into clinical practice in the past decade. “While avoiding evangelism, we show that the medical profession needs a keener and more self-conscious understanding of where it fits into the broader organisation of society.”