Vol , Issue Date of Publication: April 01, 2011
DOI: https://doi.org/10.20529/IJME.2011.047

Views
, PDF Downloads:

“When a yes should mean no”: doctors and boundaries

Sunita Kurpad Simon Kurpad
Tanya Machado
RB Galgali
Abstract:
We thank Dr Bhan for his letter in response to our paper 'Elephant in the room'. He has correctly noted that even what might be described as consensual acts of sexual boundary violations (SBVs) between doctors and their patients are not truly so due to the power differential in their relationship. This is why our paper points out that "consensual" acts of SBVs with adults are considered unethical but not illegal -- barring issues around the law on adultery in India at present. We refer to "consensual" within inverted commas, as the validity of consent for such acts is questionable because the patient might have said "yes" -- or at the minimum did not say "no" -- because of transference issues. Transference reactions are the attitudes and feelings patients bring into the relationship based on their relationship with significant others in their life.


Copyright and license
©Indian Journal of Medical Ethics 2016: Open Access and Distributed under the Creative Commons license ( CC BY-NC-ND 4.0),
which permits only non-commercial and non-modified sharing in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

Full Text

HTML | PDF
Help IJME keep its content free. You can support us from as little as Rs. 500 Make a Donation