Not irrelevant research

The letter from Bangalore by Dr. Sanjay Pai (1) regarding research that ‘cannot and should not be repeated’ raised an important and interesting point. I do agree that any research which has no benefits for the people on which it is done should not be done. Moreover, in a broader sense, it may be unethical to waste scarce resources on such matters. However, in his letter, Dr Pai clubbed a study of the ICMR in the same category of research, ie research which should not be done. This study was to measure the average length of penis in Indian males. Dr Pai has solicited comments on his view. I disagree with the author’s views on this matter. I have not read the protocol of this study. However, as a psychiatrist, I do feel that such a study is not irrelevant. Such studies have been carried out in the past, and researchers have disagreed on the results! (2)

There are many myths in the general population about the size of the penis, and these myths in turn contribute to sexual dysfunction. This research will help to dispel this myth. Moreover, it may help manufacturers of condoms to make their product of the right size. I need not mention the disastrous consequences, to the nation, of an ill-fitting condom.