Vol , Issue Date of Publication: October 01, 2009
DOI: https://doi.org/10.20529/IJME.2009.076

Views
, PDF Downloads:

ETHICS IN ETHICS COMMITTEES

Blanket consent for retrospective studies: patients’ obligation

Sunil Pandya

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20529/IJME.2009.076


May I inject a dissenting note? (1)

Public hospitals, especially those that are attached to medical colleges, perform invaluable services for their patients free of cost. They have three obligations: patient care, teaching and research.

Since all patients are treated free of cost, patients have an obligation towards the institution.

It has been the practice to use organs and tissues removed at surgery or at autopsy for teaching, research and mounting in museums. I see nothing wrong in using material obtained from patients for retrospective studies, especially since the confidentiality of patients is being respected.

Were we to deny this to teaching hospitals, they will suffer a major handicap in two of their three functions.

Remember that public hospitals attached to medical colleges have perennial problems obtaining funds, getting competent teachers and retaining them and generally carrying out their intended tasks.

Let us not add to their problems on grounds that really make no practical difference to the vast majority of patients seeking care in these hospitals.

References

  1. Jesani A. About student research and blanket consent from patients. Indian J Med Ethics. 2009 Oct-Dec. 6(4): 216-8.
About the Authors
Neurosurgeon
Jaslok Hospital and Research Centre , Dr G V Deshmukh Marg , Mumbai 400 020
Help IJME keep its content free. You can support us from as little as Rs. 500 Make a Donation